Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - w7oxz

Pages: [1]
1
Feature Requests / Another Request for Memory Capability
« on: 2017-01-01, 02:03:05 »
As W0HJW requested. I would like to see the capability use the memory functions of Kenwood radios added. I used the RRC-Nano App trial version today and found it a good application .  The implementation of the use of memory capability would be most welcome.  As it is only one repeater frequency, with offset and PL tone, set in the radio locally can be used. There is no way to load these values remotely from the Nano App.  The feature would be useful on HF also as most nets are on established frequencies.

2
General / Compression Noise
« on: 2017-01-01, 01:46:52 »
First let me thank the Remote Rig Folks for a neat application.  I had my first QSO with the Kenwood Nano application (Trial Version) today. It was impressive. 

I have placed a feature request on in the appropriate forum and will gladly purchase a license to fund further development.
I am using the Nano application with a Kenwood TS-2000.  The QSO was with hams on a repeater in my home town while I was well away from the coverage area of the repeater. Received audio was excellent. The transmitted signal reports indicated that the compression algorithm used by either the phone (Samsung S7) for the Nano app may be sufficiently aggressive that it elevates the noise between words and even syllables sufficiently to be objectionable.  I understand that the audio quality is set to 0 by default.  The report of the quality of the voice was good. Only the intervals between words/syllables were noisy. 
This problem was not noticed when using a voice quality setting of 0 with the Remote Head Control RRC/Radio RRC configuration.

Is there any way to adjust the codec used by the Nano app?

Thanks for the help
Scott
W7OXZ

3
Feature Requests / Re: Feature Request TS-2000
« on: 2017-01-01, 01:12:23 »
I am using the Nano-App with a TS-2000 located about 500 km away.  It works fine but I would like to see the VFO/Memory switch implemented.  That should be the same as a TS-480.  I have many 2M and 70cm repeaters set up as memories.

Thanks very much and 73,
Harold W0HJW

I would echo W0HJW's request.  I used the RRC-Nano App trial version today and found it usable.  The implementation of the use of memory capability would be most welcome.  As it is only one repeater frequency, with offset and PL tone, set in the radio locally can be used as there is no way to load these values remotely from the Nano App.  The feature would be usefull on HF aslo as most nets are on established frequencies

Pages: [1]