Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-05, 02:01:17 »
If you don't have a router, then why did you bother to change them to the other type of subnet? You could
have just left everything as it was before and only changed the last part of the IP number for the second units.
Seems like you have made a lot more work for yourself and messed things up in the process.

You can't mix two subnets, either all 10.10.10.X or 192.168.XX.XX. Like I wrote before, the last line should also be
the same as the one before (DNS and gateway are usually the same when using a router).

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
92
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by WW3S on 2018-04-05, 01:53:41 »
so when I get back to the EMA/911 center, I'll try that....but I'm not certain we have a router, this is just a private fiber network strictly for us, between the center, and the tower shelter about 100 ft away....like I said, we can ping all 4 units, and find them using the microbit software.....going from memory, as I dont have the units here at home, but I believe there were 4 lines to configure

IP
Subnet
Gateway
DNS server(?)

so I should set

10.10.10.xxx
255.255.255.0
10.10.10.1

and what about the last line?

Wonder if it would help if we set these up on a 198 type network first, to program them via the web interface, and then after programming, go in and change the IP address back to a 10.10.10....would the other programmed parameters stay the same?
93
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-05, 01:37:54 »
That is waaaayyyy incorrect. They should be the address of the router in your subnet, which is probably
10.10.10.1.

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
94
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by WW3S on 2018-04-05, 01:29:27 »
yes, we are using fixed addresses.....i programmed the addresses in using the setup manager....trying to remember, if I recall , I couldnt leave the gateway and DNS blank on that screen, so I made them 192.168.0.1...if thats not correct, what should be in there?
95
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-05, 01:08:31 »
That is not correct, because you told me in the last post that you are using fixed 10.10.10.X addresses.

You change them using the Microbit Setup Manager on the "setup" tab, "get from device" button.

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
96
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by WW3S on 2018-04-05, 00:58:04 »
do you mean in the RR units? I think it was 192.168.0.1 for both of them, and if I recall the subnet was 255.255.255.0....heres where it gets fuzzy, because the PC we are using doesnt have a internet connection....how do we configure the PC to use a web browser, without a true internet connection?
97
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-05, 00:44:59 »
I didn't mean the IP address, I meant the IP settings, including gateway and DNS.

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
98
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by WW3S on 2018-04-05, 00:38:12 »
one pair is setup for 10.10.10.7 and 17 and one pair 10.10.10.8 and 18, the PC we are using is 10.10.10.6....we can ping all 4 units, and see all 4 units using the setup manager find from the PC....
99
Configuration, RRC 1258 / Re: remote rig on 10.10.10 network
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-04, 23:22:34 »
What do you have as your IP settings?

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
100
General / Re: TS2000 with Nano, no power on
« Last post by dj0qn on 2018-04-04, 23:20:55 »
Adrian,

The Nano app also requires a working CAT. Do you have the serial cable installed between the TS-2000 and the
RRC COM2 port? I assumed that you did, but maybe you don't use a computer for logging or control.

73,
Mitch DJ0QN / K7DX
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]