1
General / Re: A solid Nano app is worth $200 to me
« on: 2016-05-18, 18:21:26 »
What is the status of the app update to fix the license check problem?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General / Re: App Trial Period Has Expired
« on: 2016-05-09, 13:50:39 »
The app is working for me.
Thank you.
K8OI
Thank you.
K8OI
3
General / Re: App Trial Period Has Expired
« on: 2016-05-09, 00:05:10 »
What is the estimate on the app fix?
4
General / Re: App Trial Period Has Expired
« on: 2016-05-07, 16:49:19 »
That sounds like a perfectly reasonable solution.
Thanks for the update.
Thanks for the update.
5
General / Re: App Trial Period Has Expired
« on: 2016-05-06, 14:12:57 »
AND my APP still does not work - 06 May 2016
6
General / Re: App Trial Period Has Expired
« on: 2016-05-06, 14:11:43 »
I am VERY disappointed with your license model. I did not know that EVERY time I use the app, I MUST ALSO be connected to the Internet so the license can be validated? I think that is a very poor model. I understand that you want to ensure that nobody uses your product with you receiving payment, but I have MANY apps that work when their website has problems.
I would like to see you change the program so that it DOES NOT need to depend upon the website being up!
I'm also concerned that I've purchased a product that will no longer work if you decide to stop your website or change businesses. I've spent $50 US to purchase the app; which is VERY expensive compared to the RemoteHams $10 app that works ALL the TIME!
Sincerely,
A VERY disappointed user.
K8OI
I would like to see you change the program so that it DOES NOT need to depend upon the website being up!
I'm also concerned that I've purchased a product that will no longer work if you decide to stop your website or change businesses. I've spent $50 US to purchase the app; which is VERY expensive compared to the RemoteHams $10 app that works ALL the TIME!
Sincerely,
A VERY disappointed user.
K8OI
7
Feature Requests / Re: Feature Requests - Elecraft App
« on: 2016-04-27, 15:54:08 »
Bump - any update? - Tuning request!
9
Feature Requests / Re: About Feature Requests
« on: 2016-01-31, 15:46:34 »
I was curious as to whether the "brand" of rig was important in requesting changes?
For example: Now that BT headset support has been added to the Elecraft app, did you also deploy it for the Icom & Yeasu apps? Should we simply be requesting features "generically"?
Example Subject lines:
Elecraft - Antenna Tuning OR
Antenna Tuning
Any preference?
Thank you for your work on this product - I use it every day and LOVE it!
73 de K8OI
For example: Now that BT headset support has been added to the Elecraft app, did you also deploy it for the Icom & Yeasu apps? Should we simply be requesting features "generically"?
Example Subject lines:
Elecraft - Antenna Tuning OR
Antenna Tuning
Any preference?
Thank you for your work on this product - I use it every day and LOVE it!
73 de K8OI
10
Feature Requests / Re: 7100
« on: 2016-01-29, 01:24:25 »
Agreed, we probably should relocate this thread somewhere else - BUT...
I simply use my external (public facing) IP hostname all the time. My router handles the external name resolution and NAT redirection just fine from both my internal network and external IP's. No changing ports (I have 2 sets of Remote Rigs running on my internal network) or hostnames.
I use DD-WRT on a Netgear router.
73 de K8OI
I simply use my external (public facing) IP hostname all the time. My router handles the external name resolution and NAT redirection just fine from both my internal network and external IP's. No changing ports (I have 2 sets of Remote Rigs running on my internal network) or hostnames.
I use DD-WRT on a Netgear router.
73 de K8OI
11
Feature Requests / Re: 7100
« on: 2016-01-27, 20:26:20 »
I was curious about the profile option - I'm not sure I understand what you're requesting? A local network profile vs outside your firewall? Multiple users with HF/VHF preferences?
Just curious...
73 de K8OI
Just curious...
73 de K8OI
12
Feature Requests / IC-7100 PL Tone Selection
« on: 2016-01-27, 20:21:24 »
It is necessary to use PL tones with many local FM repeaters.
13
Feature Requests / Re: Bluetooth Headset Capability
« on: 2016-01-26, 14:33:37 »
WONDERFUL!!!!
I drove into work this morning and used my Bose Bluetooth Headphone set
http://www.amazon.com/Bose-Bluetooth-Headset-Right-Ear/dp/B005LISQ0W/ref=sr_1_1?s=wireless&ie=UTF8&qid=1453815022&sr=1-1&keywords=bose+bluetooth+headset
and it worked great!!! The regular net members told me that my audio was the best they'd heard it when traveling mobile
Thank you very much!!!
73 de K8OI
I drove into work this morning and used my Bose Bluetooth Headphone set
http://www.amazon.com/Bose-Bluetooth-Headset-Right-Ear/dp/B005LISQ0W/ref=sr_1_1?s=wireless&ie=UTF8&qid=1453815022&sr=1-1&keywords=bose+bluetooth+headset
and it worked great!!! The regular net members told me that my audio was the best they'd heard it when traveling mobile
Thank you very much!!!
73 de K8OI
14
Feature Requests / Re: Bluetooth Headset Capability
« on: 2016-01-15, 16:23:36 »
I use a variety of bluetooth headsets; Bose headset, Sony Car bluetooth interface, Motorola headphones - quite a bit. I am mostly interested in the BT microphone capability. When using my phone as a "speakerphone", the mic pics up all the ambient sound.
Sorry, I don't know the details of the BT device itself.
Sorry, I don't know the details of the BT device itself.
15
Feature Requests / Re: Bluetooth Headset Capability
« on: 2016-01-06, 02:08:09 »
RRC NANO Elecraft 1.4.1
Thank you
Thank you